| The vast majority of traumatic brain injuries are closed
head, and thus inaccessible to direct visual inspection in
the absence of a craniotomy procedure by a neurosurgeon. Before
modern neuroimaging, diagnosis of closed head TBI was made
by clinical inference rather than looking at the patient's
physical brain. Neurologists checked for indirect evidence
of pressure on the brain in the form of loss of consciousness,
drowsiness, vomiting, confusion, unequal pupils, tunnel vision,
lost or diminished reflexes, and the like. If they were quite
sure the patient had brain swelling or a blood clot compressing
his brain, they would refer him for neurosurgery. Otherwise
they would refer him to a neuropsychologist for testing to
see if pen and paper tests could shed light on the probable
existence and location of "subtle" brain damage.
Today CT scans are routinely used in emergency rooms to search
the brain, its membranes and the extra-dural space, for "gross"
bleeding. CT is very helpful, but has limits. It will not
detect "mild" TBI consisting of diffuse shear injury
to axons without rupture of blood vessels (statistically the
most common form of TBI). Further, if a "slow leak"
of intra-cranial blood develops 48-72 hours after head trauma,
the CT done in the emergency room will miss it and mislead
the doctor into thinking the patient will be OK. After the
acute phase of injury, follow-up neuroimaging may be done
with any one of a variety of techniques including MRI, quantitative
MRI, functional MRI, MRI Spectroscopy, SPECT, PET, transcranial
MEG or Diffusion Tensor. For more information on these, follow
the links below.
The brain is not just a thing (a physical structure with 3
dimensions occupying space), but a living organ which performs
cognitive, visuo-motor, emotional, psycho-social and behavioral
functions through burning oxygen and glucose, firing electric
impulses down axons and secreting excitatory or inhibitory
neurotransmitters and neuromodulators. Although occupying
only 2% of the volume of the body, the brain burns 20% of
the body’s oxygen and 20% of its glucose to do this
mental work. During the 1980s and more so during the 1990s,
newer forms of "functional" neuroimaging came into
regular use. These PET Scans, SPECT Scans (and most recently
MEG) have the capacity to detect minute functional disturbance
of normal brain metabolism following traumatic damage and
to represent it visually in the form of reduced glucose uptake,
reduced cerebral blood flow and reduced electrical discharge
(nerve cell firing). Objective visualization of functional
damage is more meaningful in evaluating a TBI then having
a static picture or snapshot of the physical appearance of
brain structure. Structures which appear intact on CT/MRI
may be badly malfunctioning due to subtle damage, visible
only on neuroimaging which measures abnormalities in rate
of cerebral blood flow and neuronal consumption of oxygen
or glucose.
An excellent example of this is schizophrenia. People with
schizophrenia exhibit very dramatic and distinctive cognitive
problems (such as auditory or visual hallucinations, flight
of ideas and disordered thinking) as well as gross behavioral
problems (apathy, impoverished emotional expressiveness and
a tendency to sit mutely watching TV and smoking). Yet CT/MRI
scans of brain structure show no obvious or diagnostically
specific brain damage in these patients. See, Harvard Mental
Health Letter Feb. 2001 "How Schizophrenia Develops:New
Evidence and Ideas." Scientists who compare structural
images of 1000s of schizophrenics vs. "normals,"
have noticed schizophrenics have slightly smaller overall
brain volume and larger ventricles than "normals,"
yet this would not even be noticeable on one scan. A radiologist
who read a CT/MRI of a schizophrenic patient following a concussion
with no evidence of bleeding or swelling, would write "normal
scan" if he was not given the patient's history of schizophrenia.
The same is true of TBI. Functional brain disturbance which
causes disorders of behavior does not show up on structural
imaging. A review of older structural imaging techniques and
newer functional imaging techniques follows below.
|